Gore to Spend $100 Million to Make You Think Right
After failing to convince the American people that the sky really is falling, former Vice President Al Gore has announced that he will begin a $100 million campaign to raise awareness about global warming and push for his radical anti-progress agenda. Saying that the problem is “so interwoven with habits and patterns that are so entrenched,” Gore is going to “change the way the public thinks about it.”
Enlisting the usual suspects of Hollywood celebrities and liberal activist and lobbyist groups, Gore is contributing some $2.7 million of his own funds to the project, which will run massive ad buys on popular TV shows such as American Idol and The Daily Show. The first ad, which compares combating global warming with D-Day and the Civil Rights Movement, will be narrated by actor William H. Macy. Called the “we” campaign, Gore’s latest effort hopes to enlist 10 million volunteers and run ads in major magazines and on Facebook and MySpace.
The “we” campaign will also partner with a wide variety of organizations from the Girl Scouts to the United Steelworkers Union and pair unlikely political bedfellows such as Al Sharpton and Pat Robertson. Now, I don’t know about you, but I don’t want an army of 10 year old tarts going door-to-door preaching about how the penguins are going to die instead of selling cookies. I certainly don’t need a sermon with my Samoas. Furthermore, if this isn’t evidence of a global warming conspiracy, then I don’t know what is.
It is safe to say that Al Gore has now gone completely mad. After failing miserably to hoodwink the country by hyperventilating about lightbulbs and wind mills, Gore is now simply going to overwhelm the country with propaganda; a move which makes the D-Day reference frighteningly ironic. Hopefully someone will point out to our dear daffy duck that he is proposing a solution to a problem his allies at the UN can’t even measure, let alone quantify.
As offensive as this campaign should be to anyone with half a brain, it is even more disconcerting. The fact that Al Gore can mobilize $100 million in a largely privately funded propaganda campaign should scare the hell out of anyone who has studied history. Add to that the fact that this is the worst kind of propaganda, the kind aimed not at convincing through the careful presentation of facts but through the soft peddling of emotional influence, and you have a recipe for the worst kind of mindless populism imaginable. Throw in the fact that the man who desires to shepherd this freshly frightened flock is none other than Al Gore, a man who has been huffing his own greenhouse gases for so long he thinks that powerplants drown polar bears, and you now have the makings of the worst type of policy-making; mob-driven mania.
But don’t worry, you’ve simply been thinking wrong. The real problem is that our society has so many bad things so deeply ingrained in it that the only way out is to sit back, plug in your brain, and let Fat Algore & Friends reprogram you the right way. So, will it be the red, blue, or green pill?
This post was written by Archimedes on March 31st, 2008.
Comments: 4
Comments
Comment from Grozet
Time: March 31, 2008, 10:43 pm
http://www.thepeoplescube.com/red/viewtopic.php?t=1845 you gotta check this out.
Comment from Karmacode
Time: April 1, 2008, 11:03 am
I can’t say I am too offended. Change is necessary, regardless if you believe in global warming or not. Surely you don’t believe that producing as much power as we consume isn’t harmful to the environment. Cutting down on energy consumption is good, global warming or no. I will wait to see how subliminal/ subversive and whatnot the ads are when they come out, but until then I think it is a good idea.
Comment from Archimedes
Time: April 1, 2008, 4:40 pm
How is cutting back on energy consumption good? And how is producing as much power as we need bad for the environment? And what, exactly, necessitates change? You must not be too familiar with Gore’s agenda, judging from your comment. Gore doesn’t simply seek to improve conservation or efficiency, he wants to radically change society as we know so that it falls in line with his piep dream of some eco-harmonious utopia. The last group of people who lived harmoniously with nature were the Indians, and we can all see how well they did. Gore even went so far as to pass out manuals on how to live this lifestyle at his LiveEarth concerts. Among the reccomendations were living in “natural” houses and “composting” your own bodily waste. In non-econazi terms, this means living in a straw house and crapping in your own back yard. Not something I would call necessary.
Comment from Karmacode
Time: April 1, 2008, 9:42 pm
Lets see… most of our energy comes from coal… burning coal causes acid rain, acid rain kills trees and fish, which aside from any intrinsic value have economic importance, as well as being an important part of the food chain. It also produces smog/ reduces air quality in general, though obviously less so in both cases not then in the past, it is still a problem. Thus; consuming as much energy as we do harms not only the environment, but stuff even the most egocentric of us can care about. Also, about the comment concerning Indians, I fail to see what you mean. We can all see how that turned out? I can only assume you are talking about the genocide committed by the Europeans, in which case, good point, people who don’t care about the environment are probably better at making crap that kills, so yeah you win that point. But no I am not familiar with his agenda, and obviously if it is that far left it will not be successful. It may lead to more reasonable action, which I am all for, but will not cause ecovillages to become widespread in the US, so what is the big issue. The good which may come from this would outweigh the bad in my opinion.






Write a comment